Dispose vs. finalizers

suggest change

Implement Dispose() method (and declare the containing class as IDisposable) as a means to ensure any memory-heavy resources are freed as soon as the object is no longer used. The “catch” is that there is no strong guarantee the the Dispose() method would ever be invoked (unlike finalizers that always get invoked at the end of the life of the object).

One scenario is a program calling Dispose() on objects it explicitly creates:

private void SomeFunction()
    // Initialize an object that uses heavy external resources
    var disposableObject = new ClassThatImplementsIDisposable();

    // ... Use that object

    // Dispose as soon as no longer used

    // ... Do other stuff 

    // The disposableObject variable gets out of scope here
    // The object will be finalized later on (no guarantee when)
    // But it no longer holds to the heavy external resource after it was disposed

Another scenario is declaring a class to be instantiated by the framework. In this case the new class usually inherits a base class, for instance in MVC one creates a controller class as a subclass of System.Web.Mvc.ControllerBase. When the base class implements IDisposable interface, this is a good hint that Dispose() would be invoked properly by the framework - but again there is no strong guarantee.

Thus Dispose() is not a substitute for a finalizer; instead, the two should be used for different purposes:

Feedback about page:

Optional: your email if you want me to get back to you:

Table Of Contents